NetExt 2.1.10.5000

Rating:        Based on 3 ratings
Reviewed:  3 reviews
Downloads: 2942
Released: Aug 3, 2017
Updated: Aug 3, 2017 by rviana
Dev status: Stable Help Icon

Recommended Download

Application NetExt 2.1.10.5000
application, 4443K, uploaded Aug 3 - 248 downloads

Other Available Downloads

Application NetExt2.0.1.5000
application, 1439K, uploaded Mar 9, 2015 - 223 downloads
Application NetExt 2.0.1.5500
application, 1441K, uploaded Apr 13, 2015 - 110 downloads
Application NetExt 2.0.1.5550
application, 1442K, uploaded Apr 21, 2015 - 249 downloads
Application NetExt 2.0.1.5580
application, 1445K, uploaded Aug 4, 2015 - 130 downloads
Application NetExt 2.0.2.5000
application, 1448K, uploaded Aug 27, 2015 - 137 downloads
Application NetExt 2.1.0.5000
application, 1461K, uploaded Sep 22, 2015 - 371 downloads
Application NetExt 2.1.1.5000
application, 1461K, uploaded Jan 15, 2016 - 101 downloads
Application NetExt 2.1.2.5000
application, 1461K, uploaded Jan 21, 2016 - 1373 downloads

Release Notes

- Added !wmodule
- Added !wxml
- Added !wmakesource

Reviews for this release

     
This is perhaps the best .NET debugging extension for Windbg. It is much easier to use than SOS. If you did shy away from SOS because dumping e.g. the names of all thread objects is quite cumbersome. It is now only a !windex -tree away where you can double click on the Thread m_Name of the generated .cmdtree file. Dumping the contents of hash tables, dictionaries, lists is now as easy as it should have always been.
by Alois on Oct 25, 2016 at 11:00 PM
     
Can't overestimate NetExt help in tasks, like digging managed heap. Extremely cool extension! Keep it on.
by Kriogen on Jul 8, 2016 at 4:10 PM
     
.NET badly needs comparatively small, standalone, powerful debugger. I tried to start with WinDBG many times, but the complexity of its cryptic commands multiplied by complexity of debugging managed code (which it is not really designed to debug) always deter me from that option quickly. This extension gives me hope of WinDBG being within reach for mere mortals .NET developers and I sincerely hope Rodney would not drop it. There are not many people fluent with WinDBG enough to write extensions for it and at the same time caring about managed code and .NET developers. Wind in your sails! Konstantin
by konste on Mar 11, 2015 at 4:05 PM